That sort of “it’s hard to archive things reliably long-term” seems less relevant in the context of a review, where there’s a pretty short time between sharing the doc with the charity and making the review public.
To be clear, many of my links were to archive.is and archive.org and stuff, and they still broke. I do agree I could have taken full offline copies, and the basic problem here seems overcomable (if requiring at least a small amount of web-development expertise and understanding).
Were they successful in getting evidence removed from web archives?
Yes, many of my links over the years broke, and I haven’t been able to get any working copy.
That sort of “it’s hard to archive things reliably long-term” seems less relevant in the context of a review, where there’s a pretty short time between sharing the doc with the charity and making the review public.
To be clear, many of my links were to archive.is and archive.org and stuff, and they still broke. I do agree I could have taken full offline copies, and the basic problem here seems overcomable (if requiring at least a small amount of web-development expertise and understanding).