My understanding is that the term “domestic terrorism” as defined in the linked page can only apply to activities that:
appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;
appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;
This does not apply to the activity in the hypothetical situation that I’m considering here.
(I am not a lawyer.)
“to influence the policy of a government by intimidation” might fit, given that they may well end up more powerful than governments if they succeed in their mission to build AGI (and they already have a lot of money, power and influence).
My understanding is that the term “domestic terrorism” as defined in the linked page can only apply to activities that:
This does not apply to the activity in the hypothetical situation that I’m considering here.
(I am not a lawyer.)
“to influence the policy of a government by intimidation” might fit, given that they may well end up more powerful than governments if they succeed in their mission to build AGI (and they already have a lot of money, power and influence).