FWIW I think I’m an example of Type 1 (literally, in Lorenzo’s data) and I also agree that abstractly more of Type 2 would be helpful (but I think there are various tradeoffs and difficulties that make it not straightforwardly clear what to do about it).
Just to be clear, my conception of Type 2 is that they’re still involved in EA (e.g. through ETG, volunteering, meetups), but their job isn’t, for some period of time.
Which is partly why I think 25%/75% is better than 50⁄50
FWIW I think I’m an example of Type 1 (literally, in Lorenzo’s data) and I also agree that abstractly more of Type 2 would be helpful (but I think there are various tradeoffs and difficulties that make it not straightforwardly clear what to do about it).
Just to be clear, my conception of Type 2 is that they’re still involved in EA (e.g. through ETG, volunteering, meetups), but their job isn’t, for some period of time.
Which is partly why I think 25%/75% is better than 50⁄50