Another type of intervention that could plausibly reduce the influence of malevolent actors is to decrease intergenerational transfer of wealth and power. If competent malevolence both (i) increases one’s capacity to gain wealth and/or power and (ii) is heritable, then we should expect malevolent families amass increasing wealth and power. This could be one reason that the global shift away from hereditary monarchies is associated with global peace (I sense that both of these things are correct, but am not positive).
For example, North Korea’s Kim family is almost certainly malevolent in the way that this post describes, and the country’s political structure enables this family to continually keep power.
On a broader scale, larger estate taxes and other economic policies to decrease wealth transfer might have a similar effect.
Another type of intervention that could plausibly reduce the influence of malevolent actors is to decrease intergenerational transfer of wealth and power. If competent malevolence both (i) increases one’s capacity to gain wealth and/or power and (ii) is heritable, then we should expect malevolent families amass increasing wealth and power. This could be one reason that the global shift away from hereditary monarchies is associated with global peace (I sense that both of these things are correct, but am not positive).
For example, North Korea’s Kim family is almost certainly malevolent in the way that this post describes, and the country’s political structure enables this family to continually keep power.
On a broader scale, larger estate taxes and other economic policies to decrease wealth transfer might have a similar effect.