Why do you think earning to give is only valuable if you can give more than 50’000?
I think earning to give is valuable for anyone that can‘t do direct work. Even if they can give just 1$.
What I mean here is if you can give> $50000 a year, then it could be probable the contribution is better than direct work.
Of course, doing any small altruistic things is valuable and worth admiration(even only giving $1)
Ok I see what you mean. I agree. The number probably depends on how good you are and how good the next best person is but for every position there is probably some amount of money for which you rather left the position to someone else.
Why do you think earning to give is only valuable if you can give more than 50’000?
I think earning to give is valuable for anyone that can‘t do direct work. Even if they can give just 1$.
What I mean here is if you can give> $50000 a year, then it could be probable the contribution is better than direct work.
Of course, doing any small altruistic things is valuable and worth admiration(even only giving $1)
Ok I see what you mean. I agree. The number probably depends on how good you are and how good the next best person is but for every position there is probably some amount of money for which you rather left the position to someone else.