Basic profile: advancing into some high-leverage role in government (or some other institution such as the World Bank), from which you can help the larger institution make decisions that are good for the long-run future of the world.
Essentially any career that ends up in an influential position in some government (including executive, judicial, and legislative positions) could qualify here (though of course some are more likely to be relevant than others).
Examples:
Richard Danzig (former Secretary of the Navy, author of Technology Roulette); multiple people who are pursuing degrees in security studies at Georgetown and aiming for (or already heading into) government roles.
...
On track?
As a first pass, the answer to “How on track are you?” seems reasonably approximated by “How quickly and impressively is your career advancing, by the standards of the institution?” People with more experience (and advancement) at the institution will often be able to help you get a clear idea of how this is going (and I generally think it’s important to have good enough relationships with some such people to get honest input from them—this is an additional indicator for whether you’re “on track”).
To support your point, Holden signal-boosted this in his aptitudes over paths post: