can you say more about how you approached this decision and what seemed like the key considerations for you? I’m interested in whether you were primarily approaching it as something about his views, or about his interpersonal behaviour and alleged abuse, and given your decision to allow him, whether it was “I don’t think the allegations of misbehaviour are credible enough to act on”, or “even if the allegations were true, they wouldn’t constitute reason to exclude him”, or some third thing.
I appreciate this is probably a stressful request, and I don’t necessarily think I’m entitled to the answers, but it’s something I think about a lot so I’m really interested in hearing how people are approaching it.
can you say more about how you approached this decision and what seemed like the key considerations for you? I’m interested in whether you were primarily approaching it as something about his views, or about his interpersonal behaviour and alleged abuse, and given your decision to allow him, whether it was “I don’t think the allegations of misbehaviour are credible enough to act on”, or “even if the allegations were true, they wouldn’t constitute reason to exclude him”, or some third thing.
I appreciate this is probably a stressful request, and I don’t necessarily think I’m entitled to the answers, but it’s something I think about a lot so I’m really interested in hearing how people are approaching it.