Ha, true, this would have been more fun if I hadnāt told you š. Thank you for your kind words on the competence of my writing.
About my supposed missaprahention: It depends. Sometimes the LLM takes all of the edge and spice out of what I say, and then Iāll gladly ditch its suggestions. However, often itāll be more concise and a bit more graceful in its choice of words. Itās most definitely better at grammar and orthography than I am. In the example above, the whole message is shorter without losing any meaningful content. I think removing the āwellā from the first sentence made it a bit less clumsy. In the second sentence the word āpracticesā is slightly closer to what I wanted to express than āapplicationsā. Etc. Be that as it may, it gives me more options, which is nice. I am still free to reject its suggestions or modify them, so Iām happy itās there for me to be used if I find it beneficial, as I often do.
I used to like Grammarly for checking spelling, grammar, punctuation, and copy editing things, but it seems like itās gone downhill since switching to an LLM-based software. Google Docs is decent for catching basic things like typos, accidentally missing a word, accidentally repeating a word, subject/āverb agreement, etc.
I actually donāt agree with the LLMās changes in the two examples you mentioned and I think it made the writing worse in both cases. The LLMās diction is staid and corporate, it lacks energy.
Ha, true, this would have been more fun if I hadnāt told you š. Thank you for your kind words on the competence of my writing.
About my supposed missaprahention: It depends. Sometimes the LLM takes all of the edge and spice out of what I say, and then Iāll gladly ditch its suggestions. However, often itāll be more concise and a bit more graceful in its choice of words. Itās most definitely better at grammar and orthography than I am. In the example above, the whole message is shorter without losing any meaningful content. I think removing the āwellā from the first sentence made it a bit less clumsy. In the second sentence the word āpracticesā is slightly closer to what I wanted to express than āapplicationsā. Etc. Be that as it may, it gives me more options, which is nice. I am still free to reject its suggestions or modify them, so Iām happy itās there for me to be used if I find it beneficial, as I often do.
I used to like Grammarly for checking spelling, grammar, punctuation, and copy editing things, but it seems like itās gone downhill since switching to an LLM-based software. Google Docs is decent for catching basic things like typos, accidentally missing a word, accidentally repeating a word, subject/āverb agreement, etc.
I actually donāt agree with the LLMās changes in the two examples you mentioned and I think it made the writing worse in both cases. The LLMās diction is staid and corporate, it lacks energy.