In that case the intent is to vote 100% disagree (as you did here). That’s the belief that anything falling short of full alignment will cause total loss of value
Yes, I agree with that statement. However, answer is related to “stability under reflection”—specifically I think you’re either in or out of an alignment basin (or, that might not be possible). I think if you’re in it, it’s not correct to say “partially aligned”—what you’ve got is something that’s aligned. And if you’re out of it (or there’s no such thing), then what you’ve got is not aligned. Partial alignment to me means preserving some value only under repeated reflection, which I think is plausibly possible but exponentially unlikely (I’d pick a 99.999% disagree option if it was there, basically)
I disagree that “partially aligned” is a statement that has meaning here.
In that case the intent is to vote 100% disagree (as you did here). That’s the belief that anything falling short of full alignment will cause total loss of value
By the way, this is a very good poll!
Yes, I agree with that statement. However, answer is related to “stability under reflection”—specifically I think you’re either in or out of an alignment basin (or, that might not be possible). I think if you’re in it, it’s not correct to say “partially aligned”—what you’ve got is something that’s aligned. And if you’re out of it (or there’s no such thing), then what you’ve got is not aligned. Partial alignment to me means preserving some value only under repeated reflection, which I think is plausibly possible but exponentially unlikely (I’d pick a 99.999% disagree option if it was there, basically)