I think that AI safety donors, and all those who seek to spread values with the intention of influencing the values guiding a singleton or technological transformation, should probably be positively correlated with U.S. markets.
If you want to correlate with near-term AI development, you would buy GOOG. (Which is ~1% DeepMind).
That’s a good point, I’m editing the post to fix it. I had thought of it but during the writing process it slipped my mind.
Similar considerations would apply for animal advocacy. There are a number of companies and agricultural derivatives which could be correlated with meat production in various ways.
Actually it seems like the value of being covariant is pretty low on some basic assumptions, if I did my math right (see edit), so maybe not worth buying into tech if you would have found a better investment otherwise.
If you want to correlate with near-term AI development, you would buy GOOG. (Which is ~1% DeepMind).
That’s a good point, I’m editing the post to fix it. I had thought of it but during the writing process it slipped my mind.
Similar considerations would apply for animal advocacy. There are a number of companies and agricultural derivatives which could be correlated with meat production in various ways.
Oh yeah, why haven’t I bought any Google/Alphabet stock yet. That’s about to be fixed.
Which agriculture-related companies are you thinking of?
Actually it seems like the value of being covariant is pretty low on some basic assumptions, if I did my math right (see edit), so maybe not worth buying into tech if you would have found a better investment otherwise.
No idea. Probably depends on exactly what kind of covariance you want. I’d suggest looking through agricultural stock indices.