No worries, the problem is mine. There is a LOT that I don’t know about these issues.
So if it’s true that existential risk is very high, that makes it much harder to reduce existential risk? Or...
If it’s true that existential risk is very high, it’s not important to do what we can to reduce it?
Or, something else?
Yeah, the second: if it’s true that existential risk is high, it’s less important to do what we can to reduce it.
It can still be important, but not as important.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
No worries, the problem is mine. There is a LOT that I don’t know about these issues.
So if it’s true that existential risk is very high, that makes it much harder to reduce existential risk? Or...
If it’s true that existential risk is very high, it’s not important to do what we can to reduce it?
Or, something else?
Yeah, the second: if it’s true that existential risk is high, it’s less important to do what we can to reduce it.
It can still be important, but not as important.