A small comment: I really like the term ‘scope sensitive’, but I worry that it’s not easily understandable to people who aren’t familiar with the ‘scope neglect’ bias, which isn’t one of the more commonly known biases (e.g. when I search on Google, I get a very short wikipedia article first and at number 3 get a lesswrong article). I wonder if ‘scale sensitive’ might be more immediately understood by the typical person.
On google n-gram, ‘scale sensitive’ is about 10x more common.
I’m not sure which is better e.g. ‘scope sensitive ethics’ sounds nicer to me, but worth thinking about more if you want to turn it into a term.
A small comment: I really like the term ‘scope sensitive’, but I worry that it’s not easily understandable to people who aren’t familiar with the ‘scope neglect’ bias, which isn’t one of the more commonly known biases (e.g. when I search on Google, I get a very short wikipedia article first and at number 3 get a lesswrong article). I wonder if ‘scale sensitive’ might be more immediately understood by the typical person.
On google n-gram, ‘scale sensitive’ is about 10x more common.
I’m not sure which is better e.g. ‘scope sensitive ethics’ sounds nicer to me, but worth thinking about more if you want to turn it into a term.