Do you expect all of us—humans—to remain clueless (from impartial altruistic point of view) all the time? Or are there situations that you don’t consider to be this problematic? If so, how often do they occur?
currently, probably[1] we’re clueless about the comparison of any two actions
it’s plausible that, if we had a lot more evidence and more developed conceptual models of the cosmos, we’d be non-clueless about the comparisons of some actions. I can’t say “how often” this would occur, in the sense of how easy it would be to get such evidence and models. Seems really hard; see here.
Do you expect all of us—humans—to remain clueless (from impartial altruistic point of view) all the time? Or are there situations that you don’t consider to be this problematic? If so, how often do they occur?
I think that from an impartial POV:
currently, probably[1] we’re clueless about the comparison of any two actions
it’s plausible that, if we had a lot more evidence and more developed conceptual models of the cosmos, we’d be non-clueless about the comparisons of some actions. I can’t say “how often” this would occur, in the sense of how easy it would be to get such evidence and models. Seems really hard; see here.
Referring to my uncertainty about the logical implications of our evidence for whether or not P3 is true.