The final paragraphs of each sections usually contain discussion of how relevant I think each argument is. All these sections also have some quantitative EV-estimates (linked or in the footnotes).
But you probably saw that, since it is also explained in the abstract. So I am not sure what you mean when you say:
It’d be great if at some point you could write up discussion of those other arguments,
Hey Jacy,
I have written up my thoughts on all these points in the article. Here are the links.
“The universe might already be filled with suffering and post-humans might do something against it.”
Part 2.2
“Global catastrophes, that don’t lead to extinction, might have negative long-term effects”
Part 3
“Other non-human animal civilizations might be worse
Part 2.1
The final paragraphs of each sections usually contain discussion of how relevant I think each argument is. All these sections also have some quantitative EV-estimates (linked or in the footnotes).
But you probably saw that, since it is also explained in the abstract. So I am not sure what you mean when you say:
Are we talking about the same arguments?
Oh, sorry, I was thinking of the arguments in my post, not (only) those in your post. I should have been more precise in my wording.