It omits the most important mechanism that I mentioned in my post. The mechanism is to reward rewarding itself. This is really the most important part of my post that has been completely omitted from the summary.
“Epistemic status: This is a speculative, normative proposal relying on assumptions about behavioral adaptation, future technology, and long-term incentives; key uncertainties include whether coordination dynamics will shift as described and whether sufficient adoption can occur.”
This is not speculative, it’s based on a theoretical justification that makes logical sense. If it doesn’t make sense to someone else, please point out why.
It’s definitely not normative, in a sense that it doesn’t tell people what to do, but it offers a solution.
Key uncertainty, in my opinion:
Whether people understand the reasoning behind the solution.
Whether people have sufficient observability of people’s actions for that to work.
This is not an accurate summary.
It omits the most important mechanism that I mentioned in my post. The mechanism is to reward rewarding itself. This is really the most important part of my post that has been completely omitted from the summary.
“Epistemic status: This is a speculative, normative proposal relying on assumptions about behavioral adaptation, future technology, and long-term incentives; key uncertainties include whether coordination dynamics will shift as described and whether sufficient adoption can occur.”
This is not speculative, it’s based on a theoretical justification that makes logical sense. If it doesn’t make sense to someone else, please point out why.
It’s definitely not normative, in a sense that it doesn’t tell people what to do, but it offers a solution.
Key uncertainty, in my opinion:
Whether people understand the reasoning behind the solution.
Whether people have sufficient observability of people’s actions for that to work.