I think on priors we’d expect something like this in relation to an $8bn fraud to lead to the removal of someone from a random board.
In general, I think the traditional approach of sacking people when something they’re associated with explodes is very harmful, and I’m glad that most places I’ve worked at explicitly don’t do this.
In general, I think the traditional approach of sacking people when something they’re associated with explodes is very harmful, and I’m glad that most places I’ve worked at explicitly don’t do this.