Which would be more dystopian to you, DNA engineering to ensure the distribution of human behavior will not include unilateral destruction, or super surveillance?
I personally think DNA engineering at least has some positive points, too, while surveillance is purely a necessary evil.
DNA engineering has some positive points, but imagine the power that having significant control its citizens personalities would give the government. That shouldn’t be underestimated.
Which would be more dystopian to you, DNA engineering to ensure the distribution of human behavior will not include unilateral destruction, or super surveillance?
I personally think DNA engineering at least has some positive points, too, while surveillance is purely a necessary evil.
DNA engineering has some positive points, but imagine the power that having significant control its citizens personalities would give the government. That shouldn’t be underestimated.