[I’m doing a bunch of low-effort reviews of posts I read a while ago and think are important. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to re-read them or say very nuanced things about them.]
I think that the core idea here (about a few different worldviews you could bet on) is frequently referenced and important. I’m not 100% sure I agree with this approach theoretically, but it seems to have happened practically and be working fine. The overall framing of the post is around OP’s work, which maybe would make it seem a bit out-of-place in some sort of collection of articles.
I think I’d be pro including this if you could do an excerpt that cut out some of the OP-specific context.
[I’m doing a bunch of low-effort reviews of posts I read a while ago and think are important. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to re-read them or say very nuanced things about them.]
I think that the core idea here (about a few different worldviews you could bet on) is frequently referenced and important. I’m not 100% sure I agree with this approach theoretically, but it seems to have happened practically and be working fine. The overall framing of the post is around OP’s work, which maybe would make it seem a bit out-of-place in some sort of collection of articles.
I think I’d be pro including this if you could do an excerpt that cut out some of the OP-specific context.