The idea was that a final-chance warning would hopefully deter future incidents.
I didn’t specify either way what the consequences would be for future reports of prior-to-warning events (especially if pre-EVF) . That wouldn’t have been necessary to resolve upfront because one cannot deter past events.
Note that the future reports did come and therefore he should’ve been removed before this point in time.
The idea was that a final-chance warning would hopefully deter future incidents.
I didn’t specify either way what the consequences would be for future reports of prior-to-warning events (especially if pre-EVF) . That wouldn’t have been necessary to resolve upfront because one cannot deter past events.