Peter—yep, that’s also my impression so far, that philosophers seem compelled to reject evo debunking arguments because EDAs would render much of moral philosophy’s game (trying to systematize & reconcile moral intuitions) both incoherent and irrelevant. So they seem to be scrambling for ad hoc reasons to reject EDAs by any means necessary… and end up promoting spurious arguments.
But, I could be wrong, and there might be some more compelling, principled, and less reactive critiques of EDAs out there.
Peter—yep, that’s also my impression so far, that philosophers seem compelled to reject evo debunking arguments because EDAs would render much of moral philosophy’s game (trying to systematize & reconcile moral intuitions) both incoherent and irrelevant. So they seem to be scrambling for ad hoc reasons to reject EDAs by any means necessary… and end up promoting spurious arguments.
But, I could be wrong, and there might be some more compelling, principled, and less reactive critiques of EDAs out there.