Clear and well-written critique, that in my opinion misses the mark entirely.
“[...]The presupposition that the magnitude of the benefits (or harms) generated by some charity vary continuously in the scale of the intervention performed”
Many, if not most, assessments made by the ‘EA Framework’ do not rest on such a presupposition. There’s plenty of examples of work that would be endorsed by a vast majority of effective altruists’ which is justified through non-marginal lumpy benefits.
Clear and well-written critique, that in my opinion misses the mark entirely.
Many, if not most, assessments made by the ‘EA Framework’ do not rest on such a presupposition. There’s plenty of examples of work that would be endorsed by a vast majority of effective altruists’ which is justified through non-marginal lumpy benefits.