I ran this through QURI’s RoastMyPost.org, and it gave a mixed but fairly positive assessment (something like 68/100). Full assessment here (multiple agents/tools).
The epistemic checker and the fact checker seem particularly useful.
The main limitations seem to be:
Strong claims and major recommendations without corresponding evidence and support
Vagueness/imprecise definition (this is a partially my own take, partially echoed by RoastMyPost – e.g., it’s hard for me to grok what these new cause areas are, some are very much shorthand.)
I meant to post this last week, and I meant to give a more detailed response, but I was overloaded with work and illness. Posting this response now in the belated spirit of amnesty week.
I ran this through QURI’s RoastMyPost.org, and it gave a mixed but fairly positive assessment (something like 68/100).
Full assessment here (multiple agents/tools).
The epistemic checker and the fact checker seem particularly useful.
The main limitations seem to be:
Strong claims and major recommendations without corresponding evidence and support
Vagueness/imprecise definition (this is a partially my own take, partially echoed by RoastMyPost – e.g., it’s hard for me to grok what these new cause areas are, some are very much shorthand.)
I meant to post this last week, and I meant to give a more detailed response, but I was overloaded with work and illness. Posting this response now in the belated spirit of amnesty week.