This was a very thoughtful response, yes, I am saying 1, 2 and 3.
I also think Kirsten and Rachel’s experiences are valuable (maybe they have distinct ideas that are less directly expressed).
For next steps (?) I don’t know if or how these points should be addressed. I guess this requires involvement by the event organizers at a high level, and is interwoven with other considerations that might be difficult for a user like myself to be aware of.
While taking into account the above, maybe we could brainstorm some more lower-level systems (e.g. to facilitate for 1:2 or 1:3 matching) if CEA decides this is useful?
This was a very thoughtful response, yes, I am saying 1, 2 and 3.
I also think Kirsten and Rachel’s experiences are valuable (maybe they have distinct ideas that are less directly expressed).
For next steps (?) I don’t know if or how these points should be addressed. I guess this requires involvement by the event organizers at a high level, and is interwoven with other considerations that might be difficult for a user like myself to be aware of.
While taking into account the above, maybe we could brainstorm some more lower-level systems (e.g. to facilitate for 1:2 or 1:3 matching) if CEA decides this is useful?