Executive summary: While quantifying suffering can initially feel cold or dehumanising, it is a crucial tool that complements—rather than replaces—our empathy, enabling us to help more people more effectively in a world with limited resources.
Key points:
Many people instinctively resist quantifying suffering because it seems to undermine the personal, empathetic ways we relate to pain.
The author empathises with this discomfort but argues that quantification is necessary for making fair, effective decisions in a world of limited resources.
Everyday examples like pain scales in medicine or organ transplant lists already use imperfect but essential measures of suffering to allocate care.
Quantifying suffering enables comparison across causes (e.g., malaria vs. other diseases), guiding resources where they can do the most good.
Empathy and quantification need not be at odds; quantification is a tool to help our compassion reach further, not to diminish our emotional responses.
The piece encourages integrating both human care and analytical thinking to address suffering more thoughtfully and impactfully.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.
Executive summary: While quantifying suffering can initially feel cold or dehumanising, it is a crucial tool that complements—rather than replaces—our empathy, enabling us to help more people more effectively in a world with limited resources.
Key points:
Many people instinctively resist quantifying suffering because it seems to undermine the personal, empathetic ways we relate to pain.
The author empathises with this discomfort but argues that quantification is necessary for making fair, effective decisions in a world of limited resources.
Everyday examples like pain scales in medicine or organ transplant lists already use imperfect but essential measures of suffering to allocate care.
Quantifying suffering enables comparison across causes (e.g., malaria vs. other diseases), guiding resources where they can do the most good.
Empathy and quantification need not be at odds; quantification is a tool to help our compassion reach further, not to diminish our emotional responses.
The piece encourages integrating both human care and analytical thinking to address suffering more thoughtfully and impactfully.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.