Thank you for this—very insightful. I posted here not really sure about Hickel’s epistemics, so I really appreciate some pushback of his views. (Also: sorry for the late reply. I haven’t checked my account here for ages!) Is there any reading you’d suggest?
Without claiming to know a great deal about Hickel or his epistemics myself, I think if you are interested in forming an opinion on it yourself it might be worth sharing this Twitter thread from Max Roser (founder of Our World In Data) which does not portray Hickel as very rigorous and suggests he is somewhat dishonest.
Thank you for this—very insightful. I posted here not really sure about Hickel’s epistemics, so I really appreciate some pushback of his views. (Also: sorry for the late reply. I haven’t checked my account here for ages!) Is there any reading you’d suggest?
Without claiming to know a great deal about Hickel or his epistemics myself, I think if you are interested in forming an opinion on it yourself it might be worth sharing this Twitter thread from Max Roser (founder of Our World In Data) which does not portray Hickel as very rigorous and suggests he is somewhat dishonest.
Thank you—yes, it’s on my list of things to read soon.