For someone with a good conception of God, I do not really think you would need to convince them to take any action that promotes altruism. Perhaps you would have to remind them that altruistic acts are in line with what God desires because God is good. Actualizing what God desires, therefore, promotes goodness. So it would follow to do altruistic things.
For someone with a bad conception of God, the best way to demonstrate that an altruistic act is worth doing is to prove to them that it is truly altruistic. As long as the act does not specifically benefit solely the group in power then they should be on board.
Much like the person with the good conception of God, I think that the person with the noble sense of God is already altruistic. The noble God is a lie told to benefit everyone, by establishing an agreed-upon story. Convincing them to do another altruistic act would appear to be on board with their previously established mission which is to benefit the people.
For someone with a good conception of God, I do not really think you would need to convince them to take any action that promotes altruism. Perhaps you would have to remind them that altruistic acts are in line with what God desires because God is good. Actualizing what God desires, therefore, promotes goodness. So it would follow to do altruistic things.
For someone with a bad conception of God, the best way to demonstrate that an altruistic act is worth doing is to prove to them that it is truly altruistic. As long as the act does not specifically benefit solely the group in power then they should be on board.
Much like the person with the good conception of God, I think that the person with the noble sense of God is already altruistic. The noble God is a lie told to benefit everyone, by establishing an agreed-upon story. Convincing them to do another altruistic act would appear to be on board with their previously established mission which is to benefit the people.