I don’t think I am too convinced by the logical flow of your argument, which if I understand correctly is:
more karma = more informed = higher value on opinion
I think that at each of these steps (more karma --> more informed, more informed --> higher value of opinion), you lose a bunch of definition, such that I am a lot less convinced of this.
I’m not saying that there’s a perfect correlation between levels of karma and quality of opinion. The second paragraph of my comment points to quantity of comments/posts being a distorting factor; and there are no doubt others.
I don’t think I am too convinced by the logical flow of your argument, which if I understand correctly is:
more karma = more informed = higher value on opinion
I think that at each of these steps (more karma --> more informed, more informed --> higher value of opinion), you lose a bunch of definition, such that I am a lot less convinced of this.
I’m not saying that there’s a perfect correlation between levels of karma and quality of opinion. The second paragraph of my comment points to quantity of comments/posts being a distorting factor; and there are no doubt others.