I mean, I don’t even know what the claim is that I’m supposed to produce a report giving my own reasons for. I guess the answer is “nothing.”
(Which obviously is fine! Not all forum posts need to be targeted at getting me to change my behavior. In fact, almost none are. But I thought I might have been in the target audience, so hence I wrote the comment.)
I mean, I don’t even know what the claim is that I’m supposed to produce a report giving my own reasons for. I guess the answer is “nothing.”
(Which obviously is fine! Not all forum posts need to be targeted at getting me to change my behavior. In fact, almost none are. But I thought I might have been in the target audience, so hence I wrote the comment.)
I think the suggestion is something like this (I am elaborating a bit)-- certain organizations should consider producing a report that explains:
(1) How their organization displays good governance, accountability, and transparency (“GAT”);
(2) Why the organization believes its current level of GAT is sufficient under the circumstances; and possibly
(3) Why the organization believes that future improvements in GAT that might be considered would not be cost-effective / prudent / advisible.
Of course, if the organization thought it should improve its GAT, it could say that instead.
(3) would probably need a crowdsourced list of ideas and a poll on which ones the community was most interested in.