I had read this following a link in the UK Guardian newspaper “Mad, Bad, or Brilliant”, how could I resist?
I agree with most of the above, what I found also was that climate change was the issue that doomed the essay. Throughout the essay he discusses moving forward economically, what this means and how best to move forwards societally. However whilst he gives climate change lip service I found that all his other propositions are undermined by that he gives lip-service only. He has stated the problem but then not made any effort to figure it into any other solution. This is my mind leaves him as a climate denier in standing.
I had read this following a link in the UK Guardian newspaper “Mad, Bad, or Brilliant”, how could I resist?
I agree with most of the above, what I found also was that climate change was the issue that doomed the essay. Throughout the essay he discusses moving forward economically, what this means and how best to move forwards societally. However whilst he gives climate change lip service I found that all his other propositions are undermined by that he gives lip-service only. He has stated the problem but then not made any effort to figure it into any other solution. This is my mind leaves him as a climate denier in standing.