Had a bit of time to digest overnight and wanted to clarify this a bit further.
Iâm very supportive of #3 including âepistemics of core members to be world classâ. But fear that trying to achieve #3 too narrowly (demographics, worldviews, engagement levels etc) might ultimately undermine our goals (putting more people off, leaving the core group without as much support, worldviews becoming too narrow and this hurts our epistemics, we donât create enough allies to get things we want to do done).
I think that nurturing the experience through each level of engagement from outsider to audience through to contributor and core while remaining a âbig tentâ (worldview and action diverse) will ultimately serve us better than focusing too much on just developing a world class core (I think remaining a âbig tentâ is a necessary precondition because the world class core wonât exist without diversity of ideas/âapproaches and the support network needed for this core to succeed).
Had a bit of time to digest overnight and wanted to clarify this a bit further.
Iâm very supportive of #3 including âepistemics of core members to be world classâ. But fear that trying to achieve #3 too narrowly (demographics, worldviews, engagement levels etc) might ultimately undermine our goals (putting more people off, leaving the core group without as much support, worldviews becoming too narrow and this hurts our epistemics, we donât create enough allies to get things we want to do done).
I think that nurturing the experience through each level of engagement from outsider to audience through to contributor and core while remaining a âbig tentâ (worldview and action diverse) will ultimately serve us better than focusing too much on just developing a world class core (I think remaining a âbig tentâ is a necessary precondition because the world class core wonât exist without diversity of ideas/âapproaches and the support network needed for this core to succeed).
Happy to chat more about this.