Actually have high integrity, which means not being 100% a utilitarian/consequentialist
Sorry for the necro-reply, but just saw this and wanted to register that I think a 100% utilitarian/consequentialist can still genuinely have high integrity. (I think people are generally quite confused about what a fitting consequentialist mindset looks like. It absolutely is not: “do whatever I naively estimate will maximize expected value, without regard for trustworthiness etc.”) See, e.g., Naïve Instrumentalism vs Principled Proceduralism.
Sorry for the necro-reply, but just saw this and wanted to register that I think a 100% utilitarian/consequentialist can still genuinely have high integrity. (I think people are generally quite confused about what a fitting consequentialist mindset looks like. It absolutely is not: “do whatever I naively estimate will maximize expected value, without regard for trustworthiness etc.”) See, e.g., Naïve Instrumentalism vs Principled Proceduralism.