I’m going to be honest: I didn’t read through the whole most important century blog series, but I nodded my head along with the broad strokes of it. Reading this has been a wake-up call about the level of precision I should expect from arguments to ensure the claim and its premises are clear and able to be argued against. Thank you—I hope I will avoid pitfalls in the future because of this. I think this post is an eye-opening and (at least) well-done critique (that is clearly argued for with specific premises!). Great job!
I’m going to be honest: I didn’t read through the whole most important century blog series, but I nodded my head along with the broad strokes of it. Reading this has been a wake-up call about the level of precision I should expect from arguments to ensure the claim and its premises are clear and able to be argued against. Thank you—I hope I will avoid pitfalls in the future because of this. I think this post is an eye-opening and (at least) well-done critique (that is clearly argued for with specific premises!). Great job!