How do they find posts? Is it literally randomized from the entire set of posts or is there some kind of selection bias?
(Edit: I read a few posts and it seems like a lot of it is the author inserting their own commentary, with a general focus on hot-button issues, so I’m hesitant to subscribe, though I like the concept)
I don’t think there’s a lot of author exposition? Maybe you clicked on the pinned post, which on a quick skim seems more exposition heavy than the others? e.g. scrolling through this quickly, it’s mostly direct quotes.
I’m sure there’s some bias in terms of which posts get selected + which follow up comments get highlighted, and I haven’t investigated the author at all. I have no idea how the posts are getting selected, I wouldn’t assume this is an unbiased learning-focused news source. This is mostly for fun for me :)
How do they find posts? Is it literally randomized from the entire set of posts or is there some kind of selection bias?
(Edit: I read a few posts and it seems like a lot of it is the author inserting their own commentary, with a general focus on hot-button issues, so I’m hesitant to subscribe, though I like the concept)
I don’t think there’s a lot of author exposition? Maybe you clicked on the pinned post, which on a quick skim seems more exposition heavy than the others? e.g. scrolling through this quickly, it’s mostly direct quotes.
I’m sure there’s some bias in terms of which posts get selected + which follow up comments get highlighted, and I haven’t investigated the author at all. I have no idea how the posts are getting selected, I wouldn’t assume this is an unbiased learning-focused news source. This is mostly for fun for me :)