Thank you for sharing this!
Were it the case that I thought that the community was mistaken on any or many of its determinations, I would still consider myself to be EA.
I think that’s nice.
One issue is likely the relative unipolarity of EA funding.
I agree with this. I think this is one of the major issues, and I’ve mentioned it in the past.
no person would be perfectly represented by its collective actions.
Yes, i’d guess one could say it’s the other side of the token problem, and why we might need to show a greater diversity of people “affiliating”.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Thank you for sharing this!
I think that’s nice.
I agree with this. I think this is one of the major issues, and I’ve mentioned it in the past.
Yes, i’d guess one could say it’s the other side of the token problem, and why we might need to show a greater diversity of people “affiliating”.