Makes sense, precisely defining the risks does seem like it would help a lot.
How would external validators help (if relevant officials, voters, and legislators aren’t very concerned with these issues)? Is the idea that external validators would be useful after raising broader concerns?
It’s an excellent question. Yes, I think we agree. In general I think sunlight can be a great disinfectant. If external validators’ views were published then it would be easier to create pressure to improve the organisation that is doing bad work. We could also look at creating incentives for the organisation and individuals within the organisation to achieve better results as measured against the views of external validators.
Makes sense, precisely defining the risks does seem like it would help a lot.
How would external validators help (if relevant officials, voters, and legislators aren’t very concerned with these issues)? Is the idea that external validators would be useful after raising broader concerns?
It’s an excellent question. Yes, I think we agree. In general I think sunlight can be a great disinfectant. If external validators’ views were published then it would be easier to create pressure to improve the organisation that is doing bad work. We could also look at creating incentives for the organisation and individuals within the organisation to achieve better results as measured against the views of external validators.