(After having asked a friend how they interpreted my original comment, I think I should explain: The comment was meant as a compliment to the authors, because they’re taking seriously an idea that has been overlooked by mainstream science, and they’re helping people by being creative. I don’t think that interpretation came through because it relies on ideas explained in the book. I admit the comment was very arrogant and cynical of mainstream science, but that part was intentional.)
(After having asked a friend how they interpreted my original comment, I think I should explain: The comment was meant as a compliment to the authors, because they’re taking seriously an idea that has been overlooked by mainstream science, and they’re helping people by being creative. I don’t think that interpretation came through because it relies on ideas explained in the book. I admit the comment was very arrogant and cynical of mainstream science, but that part was intentional.)