Thanks for the detailed reply. I think you raised good points and I’ll only comment on some of them.
Mainly, I think raising the issue somewhere else wouldn’t be nearly as effective, both in terms of directly engaging Jacy and of making his readers aware.
I am glad you tried to be fair to the topic. But just like to point out that “not voting either way” isn’t absolute proof that you haven’t been affected—you could have voted positively if not for the extra discussion.
I noticed the post much before John made his comment. I didn’t read it thoroughly or vote then,
so I haven’t changed my decision—but yes, I guess I’d be very reluctant to upvote now. So my analysis of myself wasn’t entirely right.
I am mindful of the fact that I am contributing to what I am suspecting to be bad practice here, so I am not going to comment on this direction further than this.
Hmm. Should I have not replied then? … I considered it, but eventually decided some parts of the reply were important enough.
Thanks for the detailed reply. I think you raised good points and I’ll only comment on some of them.
Mainly, I think raising the issue somewhere else wouldn’t be nearly as effective, both in terms of directly engaging Jacy and of making his readers aware.
I noticed the post much before John made his comment. I didn’t read it thoroughly or vote then, so I haven’t changed my decision—but yes, I guess I’d be very reluctant to upvote now. So my analysis of myself wasn’t entirely right.
Hmm. Should I have not replied then? … I considered it, but eventually decided some parts of the reply were important enough.