Seems like a case where marginal thinking strictly dominates the abolitionist case. I’d imagine many more people could get on board with doing more to stop child smoking addiction and reducing the consumption of the most harmful tobacco products.
I’d expect the less controversial interventions to be more tractable and therefore impactful as well. Why not aim at that?
Great post!
Seems like a case where marginal thinking strictly dominates the abolitionist case. I’d imagine many more people could get on board with doing more to stop child smoking addiction and reducing the consumption of the most harmful tobacco products.
I’d expect the less controversial interventions to be more tractable and therefore impactful as well. Why not aim at that?