If I recall correctly, they do through every (at least many) chapter of The Methods of Ethics. They break down Sidgwick’s arguments in clear ways, discuss objections including from many contemporary philosophers, and then typically defend Sidgwick. I suspect most people would find this a more useful read than the original text.
I also believe Singer has stated that it was through work on this book that he changed from being a preference utilitarian to more of a classical utilitarian
If anyone is interested in “The Methods of Ethics”, I have not read it, but I do recommend “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics” co-authored by Katarzyna De Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer.
If I recall correctly, they do through every (at least many) chapter of The Methods of Ethics. They break down Sidgwick’s arguments in clear ways, discuss objections including from many contemporary philosophers, and then typically defend Sidgwick. I suspect most people would find this a more useful read than the original text.
I also believe Singer has stated that it was through work on this book that he changed from being a preference utilitarian to more of a classical utilitarian