I donât understand why you think this is the case. If you think of the âdistribution of grants givenâ as a sum of multiple different distributions (e.g. upskilling, events, and funding programmes) of significantly varying importance across cause areas, then more or less dropping the first two would give your overall distribution a very different shape.
I donât understand why you think this is the case. If you think of the âdistribution of grants givenâ as a sum of multiple different distributions (e.g. upskilling, events, and funding programmes) of significantly varying importance across cause areas, then more or less dropping the first two would give your overall distribution a very different shape.
Yeah youâre right, not sure what I missed on the first read