I received this in my DMs and am sharing anonymously on their behalf:
Zach says: “Failing to do so placed an unfair burden on Frances to self-advocate …”, but this seems to be obscuring the fact that she wouldn’t even have had a chance to self-advocate if it hadn’t been for some member of staff (presumably against CEA policy) sharing the existence of the doc with her. I wonder why this wasn’t addressed in the reflections.
Indeed, why is it that when someone did have concerns the thing they did was to partially disclose things to Frances rather than raise it within CEA? This does seem to suggest that people reading the document could feel worried about it, and also might be suggestive of issues with internal culture. I feel a bit worried that this isn’t a part of what CEA appear to be taking responsibility for addressing.
I received this in my DMs and am sharing anonymously on their behalf: