Thanks for the support, Fin! I definitely agree with you, and I hope this way people can get most of the bang for their buck and save their research time. This topic is greatly time-inefficient, just because itâs very broad and interdisciplinary, and there was no clear initial indication of whatâs good and whatâs not. So I think reading from either the âTL;DR /â Recommended Reading Orderâ, or some of the âFive Starâ or âFour Starâ books, or the âWorthwhile Articlesâ should be more than enough for the interest of EAs. The rest are more for completenessâ sake.
Hopefully I was able to highlight some hidden gems. For example, Hanno Sauerâs âMoral Teleologyâ, Victor Kumarâs âA Better Apeâ and Philip Kitcher âMoral Progressâ have flown under peopleâs radar, but theyâre really good recent contributions. Itâs a literature that has grown a bit in the past five years.
Sorry for the headers thing. That was never my intention, I just didnât know putting something in Bold made it a header. Iâve fixed it now.
Thanks for the support, Fin! I definitely agree with you, and I hope this way people can get most of the bang for their buck and save their research time. This topic is greatly time-inefficient, just because itâs very broad and interdisciplinary, and there was no clear initial indication of whatâs good and whatâs not. So I think reading from either the âTL;DR /â Recommended Reading Orderâ, or some of the âFive Starâ or âFour Starâ books, or the âWorthwhile Articlesâ should be more than enough for the interest of EAs. The rest are more for completenessâ sake.
Hopefully I was able to highlight some hidden gems. For example, Hanno Sauerâs âMoral Teleologyâ, Victor Kumarâs âA Better Apeâ and Philip Kitcher âMoral Progressâ have flown under peopleâs radar, but theyâre really good recent contributions. Itâs a literature that has grown a bit in the past five years.
Sorry for the headers thing. That was never my intention, I just didnât know putting something in Bold made it a header. Iâve fixed it now.