I think it is kind of odd to say that the setup of the jobs board is fine but the perspective needs shifiting, as 80k are by far best positioned to change the perspective people have of the jobs board.
I am not confident that 80k are making a bad trade off here, the current setup may well be close to optimal given the tradeoffs (including the time tradeoff of bothering to optimise these things). But, I am a bit averse to attitudes of ‘it’s not this one orgs problem, everyone else needs to change’ when it seems more efficient to address issues at the source.
I think it is kind of odd to say that the setup of the jobs board is fine but the perspective needs shifiting, as 80k are by far best positioned to change the perspective people have of the jobs board.
I am not confident that 80k are making a bad trade off here, the current setup may well be close to optimal given the tradeoffs (including the time tradeoff of bothering to optimise these things). But, I am a bit averse to attitudes of ‘it’s not this one orgs problem, everyone else needs to change’ when it seems more efficient to address issues at the source.
To clarify, I agree that 80k is the main actor who could + should change people’s perceptions of the job board!