Thanks for the links, Laura. To clarify, I meant to ask whether you have considered making recommendations that specifically target decreasing the key uncertainties that matter for cross-cause prioritisation. For example, decreasing uncertainty about welfare comparisons across species by supporting work like RPās moral weight project.
I think I see now, thanks for the clarification. We donāt currently include funds/āinterventions that specifically work on research (to reduce key uncertainties or otherwise). We do think this kind of work is important, and we aim to include more topics (which could include āmetaā work and research) in future iterations of the model.
Thanks for the links, Laura. To clarify, I meant to ask whether you have considered making recommendations that specifically target decreasing the key uncertainties that matter for cross-cause prioritisation. For example, decreasing uncertainty about welfare comparisons across species by supporting work like RPās moral weight project.
I think I see now, thanks for the clarification. We donāt currently include funds/āinterventions that specifically work on research (to reduce key uncertainties or otherwise). We do think this kind of work is important, and we aim to include more topics (which could include āmetaā work and research) in future iterations of the model.
Good to know.