Thank you. Let me try to rephrase my main points. I emphasize that these are just my perceptions and should not be understood as an objective critique.
The course is focused on ETG while other ways of making impact are relatively deemphasized
The course participants are not inspired to explore further but given a solution which is ETG
The style of writing, such as the use of TL;DR, footnotes, and summaries with main points may be inappropriate for teenagers, because they may prefer less professional/academic and more informal/interactive style
Some pictures show a person that may not inspire an adolescent, because the person resembles a kind parent rather than a person who outperforms parents
Biases in images are sometimes ameliorated in a way which can be interpreted as exclusive of traditionally empowered groups or introducing factual inaccuracies
I suggest that this course is offered to privileged parents of children who they seek to motivate for impact
Thank you. Let me try to rephrase my main points. I emphasize that these are just my perceptions and should not be understood as an objective critique.
The course is focused on ETG while other ways of making impact are relatively deemphasized
The course participants are not inspired to explore further but given a solution which is ETG
The style of writing, such as the use of TL;DR, footnotes, and summaries with main points may be inappropriate for teenagers, because they may prefer less professional/academic and more informal/interactive style
Some pictures show a person that may not inspire an adolescent, because the person resembles a kind parent rather than a person who outperforms parents
Biases in images are sometimes ameliorated in a way which can be interpreted as exclusive of traditionally empowered groups or introducing factual inaccuracies
I suggest that this course is offered to privileged parents of children who they seek to motivate for impact