It would be much easier to make a single, more generic policy statement. Something like:
When in doubt, assume that most EAs agree with whatever opinions are popular in London, Berkeley, and San Francisco.
Or maybe:
When in doubt, assume that most EAs agree with the views expressed by the most prestigious academics.
Reaffirming this individually for every controversy would redirect attention (of whatever EAs are involved in the decision) away from core EA priorities.
It would be much easier to make a single, more generic policy statement. Something like:
When in doubt, assume that most EAs agree with whatever opinions are popular in London, Berkeley, and San Francisco.
Or maybe:
When in doubt, assume that most EAs agree with the views expressed by the most prestigious academics.
Reaffirming this individually for every controversy would redirect attention (of whatever EAs are involved in the decision) away from core EA priorities.