Can you clarify the basis on which a post about an influential figure in the EA community that according to you makes some good points about overconfidence and over-deferral is not clearly connected to EA and doing good better? I genuinely cannot make sense of this decision or its stated justification.
Your comment only goes into specifics about the tone and rhetoric in parts of the post. Are these factors relevant to which section a post belongs to? If so, can you clarify how?
Thanks for this comment — I left a longer comment here. In brief, I hadn’t thought very hard about the decision to move the post to Personal Blog, and was in fact mostly focused on the rhetorical/inflammatory aspects of the post, and only briefly considered the strength of its relevance to EA.
Can you clarify the basis on which a post about an influential figure in the EA community that according to you makes some good points about overconfidence and over-deferral is not clearly connected to EA and doing good better? I genuinely cannot make sense of this decision or its stated justification.
Your comment only goes into specifics about the tone and rhetoric in parts of the post. Are these factors relevant to which section a post belongs to? If so, can you clarify how?
Thanks for this comment — I left a longer comment here. In brief, I hadn’t thought very hard about the decision to move the post to Personal Blog, and was in fact mostly focused on the rhetorical/inflammatory aspects of the post, and only briefly considered the strength of its relevance to EA.