Leif—thanks for sharing this! I appreciate your explanation of the Wired article, which frankly did convey the impression, for example, that you were arguing for a certain method of aid delivery.
In the letter, you provide some ‘false objections’ to watch out for.
Could you please provide what you think would be the strongest objections to your arguments, and what your response in turn to those would be?
Leif—thanks for sharing this! I appreciate your explanation of the Wired article, which frankly did convey the impression, for example, that you were arguing for a certain method of aid delivery.
In the letter, you provide some ‘false objections’ to watch out for.
Could you please provide what you think would be the strongest objections to your arguments, and what your response in turn to those would be?