And I will stand by it, due to the magnitude of the problem and the visible power of his defenders.
Now, I’ve really only been EA-adjacent so far, I’ve never attended any EA-affiliated events beyond a solstice and a house gathering. But I do have some common sense about how trust works. I do not see an alternative path for the EA community to regain trust in the event he is proven to still be an unlawful oathbreaker.
Again, this does not apply if he was an oathbreaker but is now unusually accepting of the consequences.
I will still push back on “exiled from community”—it almost makes it seem like EA is a cult, which I hope it’s not.
And I will stand by it, due to the magnitude of the problem and the visible power of his defenders.
Now, I’ve really only been EA-adjacent so far, I’ve never attended any EA-affiliated events beyond a solstice and a house gathering. But I do have some common sense about how trust works. I do not see an alternative path for the EA community to regain trust in the event he is proven to still be an unlawful oathbreaker.
Again, this does not apply if he was an oathbreaker but is now unusually accepting of the consequences.