IIRC, Open Phil often wants to not be a charity’s only funder, which means they leave the charity with a funding gap that could maybe be filled by the EA Fund.
Seems a little odd to solve that problem by setting up an “independent” funding source also controlled by Open Phil staff, though of course as mentioned elsewhere that may change later.
IIRC, Open Phil often wants to not be a charity’s only funder, which means they leave the charity with a funding gap that could maybe be filled by the EA Fund.
Seems a little odd to solve that problem by setting up an “independent” funding source also controlled by Open Phil staff, though of course as mentioned elsewhere that may change later.